Legal Opinion

National Performing Arts, Inc. v. Guettel

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1965PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBirdie Amsterdam, J.

Defendant Arthur Cantor moves for an order dismissing the complaint both individually and as general partner in the defendant Guettol-Cantor Forum Company, on the ground that the cause asserted is barred by the Statute of Frauds (General Obligations Law, § 5-701, subd. 10).

Plaintiff instituted this action against movant and two other defendants to recover damages allegedly sustained by it by reason of defendants’ breach of contract. Plaintiff is engaged in (he business of booking and managing road tours of theatrical productions, and in 1963 it negotiated with defendant Guettel for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ward v. . HasbrouckNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. In re the Estate of DitsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
  3. Sorge v. NottNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Alhambra Amusement Co. v. Associated First National Pictures, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  5. Alhambra Amusement Co. v. Associated First National Pictures, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Freedman v. Chemical Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Greystone Partnerships Group, Inc. v. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  3. Atlas Steamship Chartering Corp. v. Dillingham Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  4. Bell Independent Power Corp. v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API