Legal Opinion

Greystone Partnerships Group, Inc. v. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 18, 1993No. 92 CIV. 1262 (CHT)PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

TENNEY, District Judge:

Plaintiff Greystone Partnerships Group, Inc. (“Greystone”) brings this action against three airlines for breach of contract, tortious interference with contract, and intentionally tortious conduct resulting from an agreement between the defendants, the sole purpose of which was to evade and defeat plaintiffs possible contractual claims. Defendants Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V., a/k/a KLM Royal Dutch Airlines (“KLM”) and Martinair Holland N.V. (“Martinair”) have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(b).…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Vasile v. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1998
  2. Ivy Mar Co., Inc. v. CR Seasons Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  3. McHale v. Boulder Capital LLC (In Re 1031 Tax Group, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  4. Four Star Capital Corp. v. Nynex Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  5. Jericho Group, Ltd. v. Midtown Development, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API