Legal Opinion
Sorge v. Nott
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 26, 1962PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCharles A. Loreto, J.
Upon an application of the defendant to dismiss the complaint (Bules Civ. Prac., rule 107, subd. 7), on the ground that the alleged contract on which the cause of action is founded is unenforcible under the provisions of the Statute of Frauds (Personal Property Law, § 31, subd. 10), the court made an order of reference to a Special Referee. The plaintiff moves for confirmation of the Referee’s report, and for a denial of the motion to dismiss the complaint.
The complaint is based upon an express oral contract entered into by plaintiff with defendant, as executor of the estate of Marjorie Nott…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Saint Nicholas Cathedral of the Russian Orthodox Church in North America v. KedroffNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Matter of Gen. Reinsurance Corp. v. PinkNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Bitterman v. SchulmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Bitterman v. SchulmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
3Cited by8 opinions
- Freedman v. Chemical Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Yonofsky v. WernickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Greystone Partnerships Group, Inc. v. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Lounsbury v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1967
- Clivner v. AckermanNew York Supreme Court · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.