Legal Opinion

In re Forck

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 4, 2014No. SC88961PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEORGE W. DRAPER III, Judge.

The Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel (hereinafter, “OCDC”) seeks to discipline Nathan J. Forck’s (hereinafter, “Forck”) law license for alleged multiple violations of the rules of professional conduct that occurred while Forck was on probation. This Court finds that Forck committed violations of Rule 4-1.1, Competence, in connection with the preparation of estate planning documents and the dispensing of advice regarding Medicaid eligibility, and Rule 4-1.5, Fees, by charging an excessive fee for estate planning services and representation concerning Medicaid…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re ColemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  2. In Re StewartSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  3. In re KazanasSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  4. In Re EhlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  5. In Re HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re: R. Scott GardnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019
  2. In re: Sanford P. KrigelSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  3. Amended January 23, 2017 Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. David A. MorseSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  4. In re: Eric Alexander FarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  5. In re: Eric Alexander FarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API