Clark v. State, Department of Corrections
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETTI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Richard Clark, an Alaska state prisoner, challenges his transfer to Florence Correctional Center in Arizona on the grounds that it violated his right to rehabilitation by denying him visitation with his family and alcohol treatment. While Clark's case was pending before this court, the court of appeals ordered Clark to be resentenced on his underlying criminal conviction. Because the department of corrections transferred Clark back to Alaska pursuant to the court of appeals's decision, Clark's appeal has become moot. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ulmer v. Alaska Restaurant & Beverage Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Akpik v. State, Office of Management & BudgetAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Hayes v. CharneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Maynard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Joan K.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re Hospitalization of Naomi B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
- In Re the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Jacob S.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Alyssa B. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Tracy C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.