Legal Opinion

Dennis v. Kass & Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1895No. 1602PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court. King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, C. J.

Respondent Terry King was a constable in the city of Seattle. The other respondents were judgment creditors of the appellant. They caused an *354execution to issue upon their judgment, and placed it in the- hands of King for service. He levied the same upon the interest of the appellant.in certain personal property. This property, or a portion thereof, was claimed hy appellant under the exeniption laws, and proper and timely steps were taken to protect his rights under such laws. No part of the property was set off to him, and his interest in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stewart v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  2. Skinner v. ShannonMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Waite v. MathewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Moyer v. DrummondSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890
  5. Blanchard, Williams & Co. v. PaschalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hills v. JosephCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
  2. Lemagie v. Acme Stamp WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Adams v. ChurchOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  4. In re CrookDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1915
  5. State ex rel. McKee v. McNeillWashington Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API