Legal Opinion
Borkland v. Pedersen
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 31, 1956No. 51 C 691PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, District Judge.
The validity of Patents Nos. 2,357,806 •and Re. 23,171, both relating to the forming of plastic material, is the chief issue in this case. The plaintiff, as the .alleged inventor and owner of the patents, seeks to enjoin, and recover damages for infringement. By answer and ■counterclaim the defendants ask that this court declare these patents to be invalid for lack of invention and because .anticipated by prior use, publications .and patents. The denial of infringement contained in the answer was, during the trial, in effect reduced to the •contention that, even if the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Jungersen v. Ostby & Barton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Grinnell Washing MacHine Co. v. E. E. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Standard Brands, Inc. v. National Grain Yeast Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gustave W. Borkland v. Svend Pedersen and Borghild Pedersen, Etc., D/B/A Paramount Plastics Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- General Plastics Corp. v. BorklandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957