Legal Opinion
Partners in Nutrition's Appeal of Disapproval of Site Expansion in the CACFP Program
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 3, 2017No. A16-1422PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JESSON, Judge
Relator Partners in Nutrition challenges a decision by respondent Minnesota Department of Education (MDE) denying relator’s application to sponsor multiple sites under the, federal Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) based on a determination that Partners in Nutrition is not a financially viable organization. Because MDE’s rejection of Partners in Nutrition’s application does not comply with federally required procedures and legal standards and is arbitrary and capricious, we reverse and remand.
FACTS
Relator Partners in Nutrition is a Minnesota nonprofit corporation…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Massachusetts Trustees of Eastern Gas & Fuel Associates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated WastewaterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Citizens Advocating Responsible Development v. Kandiyohi County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Watson-Wojewski v. WojewskiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Marriage of Mesenbourg v. MesenbourgCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Partners in Nutrition d/b/a Partners in Quality Care Appeal of MDE Decision Child and Adult Care Food Program December ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2023