Legal Opinion

Partners in Nutrition's Appeal of Disapproval of Site Expansion in the CACFP Program

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 15, 2017No. A16-1422Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JESSON, Judge

Relator Partners in Nutrition challenges a decision by respondent Minnesota De*567partment of Education (MDE) denying relator’s application to sponsor multiple sites under the federal Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) based on a determination that Partners in Nutrition is not a financially viable organization. Because MDE’s rejection of Partners in Nutrition’s application does not comply with federally required procedures and legal standards and is arbitrary and capricious, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

Relator Partners in Nutrition is a Minnesota nonprofit corporation…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Trustees of Eastern Gas & Fuel Associates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated WastewaterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  4. Citizens Advocating Responsible Development v. Kandiyohi County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. Marriage of Mesenbourg v. MesenbourgCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API