Legal Opinion

Ohio Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Smith

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1934No. 24524 and 24703PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkin, J.

Although the legal procedure was quite different in these two cases, they raised in last analysis the same issue. Did the moving of the poles within the highway constitute the taking of the property of the abutting owners'? Was the relocation of the poles in the expanded or widened portion of the highway the imposition of such an additional servitude as required a grant from the abutting owners in addition to the grant of easement for highway purposes'?

There is striking difference of judicial opinion in this state and in the courts of last resort of different states regarding the issue raised…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Watson Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hofius v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Director of Highways v. KramerOhio Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. In Re AppropriationOhio Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API