Legal Opinion

Elizabeth Graham Flowers Frankie Dukes v. Tandy Corporation, and William Lee Flowers Martha Floyd Graham

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 25, 1985No. 85-1064PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge:

Tandy Corporation (Tandy) appeals a judgment upon a jury verdict finding Tan-dy liable for damages to appellees Elizabeth Flowers and Frankie Dukes as a result of Tandy’s selling a telephone recording control device to William Flowers who then used it to intercept telephone conversations between the appellees. We hold that the district court erred in submitting the case to the jury on the theory that Tandy might be civilly liable for procuring or aiding and abetting illegal wiretapping under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2511 and 2520 and by instructing the jury that it…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. California v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. DIRECTV, Inc. v. RobsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  2. Tire Engineering & Distribution, LLC v. Shandong Linglong Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  3. Javier Luis v. Joseph ZangCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  4. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. ReevesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
  5. Schramm v. FosterDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API