City of Pleasanton v. Bryant
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
These two mandamus proceedings, consolidated for purposes of trial and appeal, involve the validity of (1) an incorporation proceeding initiated by appellants (self-termed the Dublin Group); and (2) an annexation proceeding subsequently undertaken by the City of Pleasanton, of territory which overlapped that included in the incorporation proceeding. We have concluded that the trial court correctly determined that the incorporation proceeding was defective because notice thereof was filed prematurely, and that such proceeding consequently provided no impediment to the annexation; the judgment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ley v. DominguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Municipal Improvement Co. v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Reichardt v. ReichardtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dahms v. Downtown Pomona Property Property & Business Improvement DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Glass v. BenkertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Green v. American Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Clements v. Pasadena Finance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Clements v. Pasadena Finance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.