Legal Opinion
Nicolo v. Citibank New York State, N. A.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 18, 1990PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Raymond E. Cornelius, J.
The defendant, Citibank New York State, N. A., has made a motion, pursuant to CPLR 3013 and 3211 (a) (7), to dismiss the complaint, which consists of three causes of action. The plaintiff, John E. Nicolo, alleges in the first and third causes of action that he has been the subject of an unlawful discriminatory practice, because of sex, by his former employer, the defendant herein. In this regard, section 296 (1) (a) of the Executive Law provides, in relevant part, as follows:
"1. It shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice:
"(a) For an employer *…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Weiner v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Sabetay v. Sterling Drug, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Miller v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Drinkwater v. Union Carbide Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Dortz v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Zveiter v. Brazilian National Superintendency of Merchant MarineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Fair v. Guiding Eyes for the Blind, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Kahn v. Objective Solutions, Intl.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.