Legal Opinion

Naslund v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 21, 2005No. 1 CA-IC 02-0084PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GEMMILL, Judge.

¶ 1 Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 23-1044(A) (Supp.2004) was amended in 1999 to require that “fifty per cent of retirement and pension benefits received from the insured or self-insured employer during the period of temporary partial disability” be considered as “wages able to be earned,” thereby reducing temporary partial disability compensation benefits owed to the workers’ compensation claimant. 1999 Ariz. Sess. Laws, ch. 331, § 6. In 1925, the voters of Arizona enacted Article 18, Section 8, of the Arizona Constitution, which states in pertinent part…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  2. Hall v. A.N.R. Freight System, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Trustmark Insurance v. Bank One, Arizona, NACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  5. Adkins v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Obregon v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. DeVries v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. David Garcia v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API