Legal Opinion
Barry v. Drennen
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided August 13, 2004No. 1030827PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HOUSTON, Justice.
The plaintiff, The D.M. Drennen and Emma Houston Drennen Memorial Trust of Saint Mary’s Church (“the Drennen Trust”), a trust duly established under Alabama law, brought this action against Michael Barry seeking a judgment declaring that the Drennen Trust, which owns property (“the Drennen property”) adjacent to property owned by Barry, (1) holds unrestricted title to that portion of the Drennen property on which an encroachment is allegedly located; (2) that the encroachment in dispute was permissive in nature from its inception up through at least the summer of 2002, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Phillips v. AmSouth BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Parr v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Auburn University v. ADVERTISER COMPANYSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Central Accept. Corp. v. Colonial Bank of Ala.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Starks v. Commercial Union Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rosser v. AAMCO Transmissions, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005