Legal Opinion

Auburn University v. ADVERTISER COMPANY

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 23, 2003No. 1002096PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

I. Introduction

Defendants Auburn University and the members of the Auburn University Board of Trustees ("the Board") appeal the summary judgment and the permanent injunction entered in favor of plaintiffs The Advertiser Company d/b/a The Montgomery Advertiser, and seven other newspapers (hereinafter collectively called "the newspapers") on their claims for injunctive and declaratory relief to redress alleged violations of the Sunshine Law, § 13A-14-2, Ala. Code…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Ex Parte State Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  3. Smith County Education Ass'n v. AndersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State Ex Rel. Newspapers Inc. v. ShowersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Adler v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shiv-Ram, Inc. v. McCalebSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. Ex Parte MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Birmingham Bd. of Educ. v. BoydSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Dillman v. Trustees of Indiana UniversityIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Slagle v. RossSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API