Legal Opinion

Oneida Seven Generations Corporation v. City of Green Bay

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 2015No. 2013AP000591PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnn Walsh Bradley, J.

¶ 1. Oneida Seven Generations Corporation sought a conditional use permit to install a renewable energy facility in the City of Green Bay (the City).1 Although the City initially voted to grant the permit, it subsequently voted to rescind the conditional use permit on the basis that it was obtained through misrepresentation. The court of appeals determined that the City's decision that the permit was obtained through misrepresentation was not supported by substantial evidence and reversed.2

¶ 2. The City now seeks review of the unpublished decision of the court of appeals that reversed the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Robertson Transportation Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Ottman v. Town of PrimroseWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State Ex Rel. Harris v. Annuity & Pension BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Copland v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Wagner v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. AllEnergy Corporation v. Trempealeau County Environment & Land Use CommitteeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Enbridge Energy Company, Inc. v. Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Michael Anderson v. Town of NewboldWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Michael Anderson v. Town of NewboldWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
  5. AllEnergy Corporation v. Trempealeau County Environment & Land Use CommitteeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API