Legal Opinion · Concurrence

AllEnergy Corporation v. Trempealeau County Environment & Land Use Committee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 2017No. 2015AP000491Published

1Concurrence

¶ 133.

ANNETTE KINGSLAND ZIEGLER, J.

{concurring). I respectfully concur in the mandate. In my view, the lead opinion and the dissent have made this case much more complicated and potentially more far-reaching in effect than it should be. This case can and should be decided narrowly: ours is a certiorari review.

¶ 134. Our review in this case is limited. On certiorari review we examine:(1) whether the [Trempealeau County Environment & Land Use Committee ("the Committee")] kept within its jurisdiction; (2) whether it proceeded on a correct theory of law; (3) whether its action was arbitrary,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ottman v. Town of PrimroseWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Cemetery Services, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Regulation & LicensingCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
  3. Oneida Seven Generations Corporation v. City of Green BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Sills v. Walworth County Land Management CommitteeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  5. County of Milwaukee v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API