Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Enbridge Energy Company, Inc. v. Dane County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2019No. 2017AP000013PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRebecca Grassl Bradley, J.

¶1 Enbridge Energy Company 1 operates an interstate pipeline transporting liquid petroleum. Dane County issued to Enbridge a conditional use permit ("CUP") including two conditions requiring Enbridge to procure additional insurance prior to expanding its pipeline pump station. After Dane County initially approved the CUP with these insurance conditions, but pending Enbridge's appeal to the Dane County Board of Supervisors, the Wisconsin Legislature passed 2015 Wisconsin Act 55, which prohibits counties from requiring an interstate pipeline operator to obtain additional insurance when the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Federal Power Commission v. Idaho Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Sanford v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Claussen v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  5. Just v. Land Reclamation Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chris Hinrichs v. DOW Chemical CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Town of Wilson v. City of SheboyganWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Derrick A. Sanders v. State of Wisconsin Claims BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Town of Wilson v. City of SheboyganWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Daniel Birge v. Simplicity Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API