Legal Opinion
MacDiarmid v. Lawbar Petroleum
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided September 25, 1978No. SA 75 CA 268PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER OF REMAND
SPEARS, Chief Judge.
On this date came on for consideration the third party defendant’s motion to remand or in the alternative to dismiss, along with the defendant Lawbar Petroleum, Inc. and Gilbert Brown’s response thereto. Since the plaintiff has failed to respond to the third party defendant’s motion to remand filed on September 1, 1978 as required by Local Court Rule 14(f), the Court must presume that the plaintiff does not oppose said motion.
This case is presently before this Court after having been removed from the 81st Judicial District Court of Frio County, Texas upon…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gravitt v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Potomac Passengers Association v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Warren G. Kleban Engineering Corp. v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Anniston Soil Pipe Co. v. Central Foundry Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Schmidt v. National Organization for WomenDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1983
- Penrod Drilling Corp. v. Granite State InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1990
- Medical Legal Consulting Service, Inc. v. CovarrubiasDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1986
- Barela v. BarelaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Demery v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.