Legal Opinion
Penrod Drilling Corp. v. Granite State Insurance
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided October 17, 1990No. Civ. A. L-89-70PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KAZEN, District Judge.
Pending are Plaintiff Penrod Drilling Corporation’s (Penrod) Application for Attorney’s Fees and Defendants’ opposition to the motion. Defendants raise two questions: 1) was the award of attorney’s fees proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c); and 2) if proper, did Penrod sufficiently document its fee application?
Award of Attorney’s Fees. In assessing the propriety of the award of attorney’s fees, the Court looks first to the language of the statute:
An order remanding the case may require payment of just costs and any actual expenses, including attorney…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Copper Liquor, Inc. v. Adolph Coors Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- News-Texan, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. The City of Garland, Texas, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Elkhart Cooperative Equity Exchange v. DayDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1989
- Medical Legal Consulting Service, Inc. v. CovarrubiasDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Valdes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- James T. Morris Ray N. Pry James A. Destro Larry E. Wilson v. Bridgestone/firestone, Inc. Donald L. Groninger George W. AucottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Gray v. New York Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995
- McHugh v. Physicians Health Plan of Greater St. Louis, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1997
- Jenkins v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.