Legal Opinion
Elkind v. Byck
California Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1968No. L. A. 29441PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, C. J.
Plaintiff appeals from an order denying her application for child support filed under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (hereafter URESA; Code Civ. Proc., § 1670 etseq.).
Plaintiff and defendant were married in New York on May 4, 1956, and divorced in Georgia on July 31, 1957. Their daughter, Kim Ivy, was born on April 19, 1957. “In lieu of permanent alimony,” the judgment of divorce “incorporated in its entirety” the agreement made between the parties on July 3, 1957, “with reference to the support and maintenance ’ ’ of the plaintiff and her minor child.
The agreement recited…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Yarborough v. YarboroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Armstrong v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Ruddock v. OhlsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Klemm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- In Re Marriage of O'ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Olson v. OlsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.