Legal Opinion

Lickley v. Max Herbold, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1999No. 24615PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Chief Justice.

This appeal involves a contract dispute. Lonnie Lickley (Lickley), a potato grower, entered a preseason potato growing contract with Max Herbold, Inc. (Herbold). After harvest, a dispute arose as to the price to be paid. Following a bench trial, the court awarded Lickley $33,000 in damages. The trial court found that because a substantial portion of the potatoes delivered failed to meet agreed upon standards, the contract required the parties to renegotiate a price. However, the parties could not agree, so the trial court set the price for the substandard potatoes at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marshall v. BlairIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  2. First Security Bank of Idaho, N.A. v. MurphyIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Bott v. Idaho State Building AuthorityIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Hunter v. ShieldsIdaho Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Roberts v. RobertsIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Cristo Viene Pentecostal Church v. PazIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Belk v. MartinIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Campbell v. KildewIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Roe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API