Legal Opinion

Workers' Compensation Claim of Britton v. Halliburton Services

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1995No. 94-173PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Chief Justice.

In this worker’s compensation appeal, we consider whether substantial evidence supports the findings and conclusions of the hearing examiner.

We affirm the order of the district court denying additional benefits.

FACTS

On December 15, 1990, appellant John Britton (Britton), while working for Halliburton Services (Halliburton), fell from a moving truck, injuring his back and his right knee. Britton received medical benefits and temporary total disability benefits until March 14, 1991. Just before obtaining his medical release to return to work, Britton fell down a flight of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. FMC v. LaneWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Jaqua v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Lehman v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Workers' Compensation Claim of Little America Refining Co. v. WittWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division v. JerdingWyoming Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Martinez v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Worker's Compensation Claim of Glaze v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  3. David v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Chapman v. MeyersWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Glaze v. STATE EX REL. DIVISIONWyoming Supreme Court · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API