Jaqua v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether substantial evidence exists to support a denial of benefits under the Wyoming Worker’s Compensation Act (Wyo.Stat. §§ 27-14H01 to -805 (1991 & Supp.1993)). Donald T. Jaqua (Jaqua), in a creative manner, attempts to couch the question as one of law; but we are satisfied the determination by the hearing examiner is supported by substantial evidence, and the question truly is one of fact. Jaqua asserted an entitlement to benefits because of a back injury he sustained as a result of a fall on stairs while working as an employee of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Aanenson v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Sinclair Trucking v. BaileyWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Campbell County v. Wyoming Community College CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Abas v. State ex rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Woodman v. Grace Bomac DrillingWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
3Cited by19 opinions
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Newman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Corman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Wyoming Steel & Fab, Inc. v. RoblesWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Thornberg v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Hepp v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.