Lehman v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The only question presented in this appeal is whether the evidence is sufficient to support the determination of the district court that Marion Lehman was not entitled to receive an award of additional temporary disability nor an award of permanent disability. We have reviewed the record in accordance with the applicable standard, and we conclude that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the decision of the inferior *423court.1 We affirm the judgment of that court.
Lehman poses these issues in his brief:
“I. Did the district court err in failing to award appellant his claim for…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Kempe's Lessee v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1809
- State of Florida v. SullivanSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
- Ex parte RoundtreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874
- Conn v. Ed Wederski Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Pacific Power and Light v. ParsonsWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hohnholt v. Basin Electric Power Co-OpWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Wright v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Nielsen v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Brebaugh v. HalesWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- FMC v. LaneWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.