Legal Opinion

FMC v. Lane

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1989No. 88-262PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The question that the court must resolve in this case is how the contested case procedure adopted by the legislature for disposing of claims for workers’ compensation benefits that are objected to 1 blends into the existing body of substantive law and the Wyoming Administrative Procedure Act 2 . In their respective briefs, the parties suggest a number of issues relating both to procedure and disposition on the merits. 3 We conclude, however, that the failure of the independent hearing officer to couch his findings of fact in the manner required by statute and prior decisions…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Wind River Indian Education Ass'n v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Mountain Fuel Supply Co. v. Public Service Commission of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Holding's Little America v. Board of County Commissioners of Laramie CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Geraud v. SchraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. City of Casper v. UtechWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Mekss v. Wyoming Girls' SchoolWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Worker's Compensation Claim of Decker v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Medical CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Workers' Compensation Claim of Jackson v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Schulthess v. CarolloWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API