Legal Opinion
Heiser v. Woodruff
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 7, 1942No. 2414PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
M. E. Heiser recovered judgment by default against Leonard J. Woodruff in the United States Court for Southern California; a motion to vacate and set aside such judgment and permit the defendant to answer was denied; and on June 29, 1939, an order was entered refusing to modify the judgment as to amount. Woodruff was adjudged a bankrupt in the United States Court for Eastern Oklahoma, and a trustee was appointed and qualified. Heiser filed in the bankruptcy proceeding a claim predicated upon the judgment rendered in California. The trustee, and certain persons claiming…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Oelrichs v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Tullock v. MulvaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Jackson v. HeiserCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Salvage Process Corp. v. Acme Tank Cleaning Process Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States Steel Corp. v. United Mine WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Paula C. Bass, of the Estate of Arthur C. Bass v. First Pacific Networks, Inc., and T. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Donnelly Garment Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Merck & Co. Inc. v. LyonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1996
- Artistic Hairdressers, Inc. v. LevyNevada Supreme Court · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.