Legal Opinion
Congoleum Industries, Inc. v. Armstrong Cork Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 27, 1975No. 74--1366PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
This appeal caps a protracted litigation of more than eight years duration for the infringement of Congoleum’s patents for chemically embossing floor coverings. Appellant Armstrong Cork Company, long the dominant firm in the floor covering industry, urges a broadside attack on the proceedings in the district court. After careful consideration of the contentions raised by brief and oral argument, we affirm the meticulous 1 find ings and conclusions of District Judge John B. Hannum. 339 F.Supp. 1036 (E.D.Pa.1972) and 366 F.Supp. 220 (E.D.Pa.1973).
The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- George S. Krasnov v. Brendan DinanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- United Steelworkers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- In Re Kellett Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Consolidated Sun Ray, Inc. v. LeaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- United States v. United Steelworkers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Beaumont Gereau, in Nos. 74-2019, 74-2020, 74-2021, 74-2022,74-2023Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Usm Corporation v. Sps Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Mannington Mills, Inc. v. Congoleum Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Studiengesellschaft Kohle mbH v. Dart Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982
- Ralston Purina Co. v. Far-Mar-Co, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.