United States v. Hinote
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
EARLY, Judge:
Tried by general court-martial, the accused was convicted, despite his pleas, of two specifications of carnal knowledge and one specification of incest, in violation of Articles 120 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920, 934. The approved sentence extends to forfeiture of $250.00 per month for five months, restriction to the limits of Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, for one month, and a reprimand.
This case has been forwarded for review pursuant to Articles 66 and 69, Code, supra, by the Acting The Judge Advocate General, who has directed our…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hodge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- United States v. WorleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. Iturralde-AponteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. KirbyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- United States v. VogelUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. NewbillU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1977
- United States v. SaulU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. ClarkU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1983
- United States v. SherwoodU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979
- United States v. LundU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.