Legal Opinion
United States v. Saul
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
Decided April 25, 1988No. ACM 25736PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
BLOMMERS, Judge:
Despite pleas of not guilty, the appellant was found guilty following a trial before members of six specifications alleging various forms of sexual misconduct with his natural daughter, D. Included were three specifications of indecent liberties, two specifications of sodomy with a child under the age of 16 and a specification of assault with intent to commit rape. The offenses occurred between March 1983, when the appellant and his family were first assigned to Hawaii, and January 1986. The victim was 12 years old when this period commenced and was a month short of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. Orange Jell BeechumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. BarnardU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. CiullaU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. ReedU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. CannonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. NapoleonUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.