Bonamy v. City of Seattle
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Per curiam
Lance Bonamy appeals the summary judgment order that dismisses his claims against the City of Seattle for alleged violations of the Washington public disclosure act (Public Records Act). Because there were no disputed issues of material fact, the City was properly entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, we affirm.
FACTS
In 1995, Bonamy was employed at Seattle City Light as a maintenance laborer. In December of that year, he learned that he was being investigated for having allegedly harassed a fellow employee. After obtaining the results of that investigation, Bonamy sent an…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hearst Corp. v. HoppeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Bristol-Myers Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Dawson v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Central Washington Bank v. Mendelson-Zeller, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Amren v. City of KalamaWashington Supreme Court · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Hangartner v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Hangartner v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- King County v. SheehanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- King County v. SheehanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Smith v. Okanogan CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.