Legal Opinion
Griffith v. Mt. Carmel Medical Center
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided August 23, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-1141-MLBPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BELOT, District Judge.
This ease comes before the court on defendant Mount Carmel Medical Center’s motion for partial summary judgment. (Doc. 183). The case arises out of events surrounding the medical treatment of plaintiffs now deceased husband, Jimmy R. Griffith, Jr., at Mount Carmel Medical Center (“Mount Carmel”) in Pittsburg, Kansas. Mrs. Griffith has asserted a claim under a federal statute, the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA), 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd, alleging that Mount Carmel failed to provide Mr. Griffith an “appropriate medical screening”…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Alexander Shapolia v. Los Alamos National Laboratory, and John WhettenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Gatewood v. Washington Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Cleland v. Bronson Health Care Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Phillips v. Hillcrest Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Power v. Arlington Hospital Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Godwin v. Memorial Medical CenterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- Power v. Arlington Hospital AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Guzman Ex Rel. Guzman v. Memorial Hermann Hospital SystemDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.