Legal Opinion
Alexander Shapolia v. Los Alamos National Laboratory, and John Whetten
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 27, 1993No. 92-2218PublishedCited by 264 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. Therefore, the case is ordered submitted without oral argument.
This case comes before us ’on a pro se appeal of the district court’s order granting the defendant-appellee’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
The plaintiff-appellant, Alexander Shapo-lia, began working as an electrician at the Los Alamos National Lab (LANL) in February 1976. In March of 1987, he…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by264 opinions
- Prater v. City Of BurnsideCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Jennifer Venters v. City of Delphi and Larry IvesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Prater v. City of BurnsideCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Lynn Noyes v. Kelly Services, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Stover v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
259 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.