Legal Opinion

People v. Monaco

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2006No. Docket 126852PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case, we are asked to decide whether a violation of the statute that makes it a felony to refuse to pay court-ordered support for a former or current spouse or for a child, MCL 750.165(1), is subject to the ten-year period of limitations in MCL 600.5809(4) or the six-year “catch-all” period of limitations in MCL 767.24(5). We are also asked to decide whether a violation of this statute constitutes a continuing offense.

We affirm the Court of Appeals conclusion that a charge of felony nonsupport is subject to the six-year period of limitations of MCL 767.24(5).1 We reject the Court of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. SchaeferMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. LivelyMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. PashaMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Skotak v. Vic Tanny International, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. People v. KingMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. People v. AnsteyMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  4. People of Michigan v. Selesa Arrosieur LikineMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  5. People v. BrantleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API