L. A. Randolph Co. v. Lewis

The first issue was answered by consent; but in reference to the second the defendant excepted to his Honor’s instruction that she had admitted that the notes represent the purchase price of an automobile sold by the plaintiff to her and her husband. There are at least two reasons why these exceptions (first'andseeond)' cannot be sustained. (1) Certain expressions in her testimony are susceptible of the interpretation given them in the charge, and if she wished to contest the question whether she and her husband had bought the car she should have called the matter to the attention of the…