Legal Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. Eisenstein

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 27, 1994No. Misc. (Subtitle BV) No. 25, September Term, 1992PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN F. McAULIFFE, Judge (Retired).

The Attorney Grievance Commission (the Commission) charges that Myles R. Eisenstein, respondent, violated a number of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct by the manner in which he collected fees and handled the funds of William C. Taylor (the claimant) in connection with a claim brought against ITO Corporation (ITO) under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (hereinafter “LHWCA” or “the Act”) and by advancing certain living expenses to the claimant during the pendency of the litigation. Pursuant to Maryland Rule BV 9(b), this Court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND OF MARYLAND v. OwrutskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AlisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KorotkiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. HambyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MonfriedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ShapiroCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HessCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McClainCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API