Legal Opinion

Abel v. Madden

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 30, 1987No. 65720PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, Justice.

The issues presented are whether the Pottawatomie County Excise Board (Board), appellee, failed to examine the Sheriffs estimate of needs and provide adequate funding; whether the Board improperly considered a nonrecurrent revenue source in the final budget; and whether the County Commissioners failed to follow statutory procedures in preparing a financial statement. We find that: 1) when the items budgeted are excessive, the Board has the authority to reduce the proposed budget; 2) the Board may not consider nonrecurrent sources of revenue when determining the budget…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Lawrence v. Cleveland County Home Loan AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. Payne, County Treas. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. Rogers v. Excise Bd. of Greer CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  5. In re Mental Health of D. B. W.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morton v. Adair County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Gaines v. MaynardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. Excise Board of Sequoyah CountyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
  4. Gaines v. MaynardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. Morgan v. DaxonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API