Legal Opinion

Gaines v. Maynard

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 19, 1991No. 67752, w/67798Published

1Opinion of the Court

808 P.2d 672 (1991)

Stephen Joseph GAINES and Martin Earl Hedgpath, Appellants,

v.

Gary MAYNARD, Warden, All his Agents, Servants, Representatives and Employees, Including All Guards and other Personnel and all their successors in Office, Appellees.

Nos. 67752, w/67798.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

March 19, 1991.

Martin Earl Hedgpath, Lexington, pro se and for appellant.

Robert H. Henry, Atty. Gen. and Sue Wycoff, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellees.

SUMMERS, Justice.

Plaintiffs are American Indian prisoners seeking a writ of mandamus against their Warden. Boiled down, their suit is for the…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Opala; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Opala; Dissent.

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Walter Gordon v. William D. Leeke, Commissioner Joe Martin, Warden, Wayne Stephen Young v. George H. Collins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
  4. Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API