Legal Opinion

Rozema v. the Marshfield Clinic

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided October 2, 1997No. 96-C-592-C, 96-C-916-C and 96-C-730-CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND OPINION

CRABB, District Judge.

This is a civil antitrust action for monetary, declarative and injunctive relief brought pursuant to the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and Wis. Stat. §§ 133.03 and 133.14. Plaintiffs contend that defendants violated the federal and state statutes by entering into a continuing contract, combination or conspiracy to divide the market for all physician services within an eight-county area in north central Wisconsin. Plaintiffs have reached a preliminary settlement agreement with defendants North Central Health Plan of Wisconsin and Rhinelander Medical Center,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Nine West Shoes Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  2. In re Processed Egg Prods. Antitrust Litig.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Mirage Wine + Spirits, Inc. v. Apple Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API