Rozema v. the Marshfield Clinic
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
CRABB, District Judge.
This is a civil antitrust action for monetary, declarative and injunctive relief brought pursuant to the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and Wis. Stat. §§ 133.03 and 133.14. Plaintiffs contend that defendants violated the federal and state statutes by entering into a continuing contract, combination or conspiracy to divide the market for all physician services within an eight-county area in north central Wisconsin. Plaintiffs have reached a preliminary settlement agreement with defendants North Central Health Plan of Wisconsin and Rhinelander Medical Center,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Nine West Shoes Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- In re Processed Egg Prods. Antitrust Litig.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Mirage Wine + Spirits, Inc. v. Apple Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2025