Legal Opinion

In re Processed Egg Prods. Antitrust Litig.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 2019No. MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION No. 08-md-2002PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPratter, J.

INTRODUCTION

In 2016, the Court granted the defense motion for summary judgment on Direct Action Plaintiffs' egg product-related claims on the grounds that they lacked standing. The DAPs successfully appealed that ruling and the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit remanded the case for further disposition. The defendants then filed joint and individual motions for summary judgment on the DAPs' egg product-related claims. This Memorandum addresses those motions.

The defendants jointly argue that the DAPs failed to demonstrate that any alleged antitrust violation caused injuries. The Court…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kraft Foods Global, Inc. v. United Egg Producers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  2. Kraft Foods Global, Inc. v. United Egg Producers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  3. Kraft Foods Global, Inc. v. United Egg Producers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  4. Kraft Foods Global, Inc. v. United Egg Producers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  5. WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC. v. EASTERN MUSHROOM MARKETING COOPERATIVE, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API