Hall v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

DISSENTING OPINION

BY Senior Judge FLAHERTY.

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion in this matter. Because I agree that the Workers’ Compensation Appeal *745Board (Board) erred to the extent it found substantial, competent evidence to support a termination of benefits, I would reverse on this issue.

This case is made complicated by the haphazard execution of the NCP. As indicated by the Majority, the NCP indicates that the “Body Part(s) Affected” by Claimant’s August 12, 2004 injury was the “low back.” Claimant’s brief at p. 69. That same document, however, lists a “Description of Injury”…