Legal Opinion

Central Park Lodge v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 20, 1998PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

The issue on appeal is whether there is substantial, competent evidence to support the Workers’ Compensation Judge’s (WCJ’s) conclusion that Alice Robinson (Claimant) is completely recovered from her work-related disabilities. Because there is not, the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board), which reversed the WCJ’s grant of a Petition for Termination, is affirmed.

The relevant facts are as follows. On November 25, 1986, Claimant was injured while working for Central Park Lodge (Employer) when a metal grate fell and struck her on the head. By decision…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Volterano v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Metropolitan Ambulance, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. GA & FC Wagman, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Aucker)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Jackson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Paul v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API