Legal Opinion
Patton v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 23, 2005No. 01-161 CPublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Partial Summary Judgment. Oral argument was deemed unnecessary. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment are DENIED AS MOOT.
BACKGROUND1
Plaintiff, Thomas Patton, is asserting, inter alia, a claim for breach of an alleged implied-in-fact contract between plaintiff and the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Lengen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- MORI Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- CBY Design Builders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- ARRA Energy Co. I v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Chisolm v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.