State v. Williams
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Chief Justice.
The issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in allowing the state to impeach one of defendant’s witnesses, David Small, by use of extrinsic evidence of prior inconsistent statements. We conclude admission of the impeachment testimony constitutes reversible error.
I
At trial, the nineteen-year-old prosecutrix testified that on the evening of 28 December 1986 she went to the Starlight Palace Club with Mary Small, David Small, Lennie Alston and defendant. She later left the club with defendant and Alston. As the three drove home, defendant “took a short cut,” stopped…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. CutshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. BagleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. McQueenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. NajewiczCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.