Legal Opinion

Riley v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 10, 1975No. 1 CA-IC 1157PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NELSON, Presiding Judge.

The issue before the Court in this case is whether Maureen E. Riley, petitioner herein (Riley), filed her claim for compensation “within one year after [her] injury occurred or the right thereto accrued” as required by A.R.S. § 23-1061A. The hearing officer found that she did not and denied compensation on that basis. We concur in the hearing officer’s findings and affirm the award.

There are no substantial disputes in the facts leading up to this claim. Riley, a registered nurse who had just completed her training, went to work in Spetember, 1969 for R. Michael…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. English v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  2. State Compensation Fund v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  3. Mead v. American Smelting & Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  4. Freig v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Bluma v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Thompson v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Nelson v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API