Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1989No. CV-88-0302-PRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

I. JURISDICTION

Claimant, Richard Thompson, suffered a heart attack on the job while employed by FNF Construction. Thompson filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits. The administrative law judge denied the claim, holding that Thompson had failed to “forthwith” report the accident and injury to his employer as required by A.R.S. § 23-908(D). The court of appeals affirmed and we accepted Thompson’s petition for review. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3), A.R.S. §§ 12-120.24, 23-948 and Ariz.R.Civ.App.P. 23, 17B A.R.S.

II. ISSUE

We must answer one…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Magma Copper Co. v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Pacific Fruit Express v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Emery v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Andronaco v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Bollerer v. George & Lucille ElenbergerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Douglas Auto & Equipment v. State Comp fund/zazuetaArizona Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API