Legal Opinion
Jonas v. Conrath
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided June 24, 1993No. Civ. A. No. 6:92-1065PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
Pending is Defendant Prudential Insurance Company of America’s (Prudential’s) motion for summary judgment and motion to sever. For reasons discussed herein, the Court DENIES these motions,
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The facts of this case are in dispute. The Court, however, will attempt a summary of the factual disputes presented. Plaintiffs’ claim against Prudential sounds in contract. The claim asserted against Dr. Conrath and Vision Care Associates, Inc. (Vision Care), and which is not in issue currently, is grounded in tort.
Prudential provides…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Harold S. McDaniel v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., Third Party v. Force Corporation, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Rumbaugh v. Winifrede Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- D'Annunzio v. Security-Connecticut Life Ins.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
- Ward v. BakerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Call of the Wild Movie, LLC v. DOES 1-1,062District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Davidson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Grennell v. Western Southern Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2004
- Pena v. McArthurDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1994
- DirecTV, Inc. v. BoggessDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.