Harold S. McDaniel v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., Third Party v. Force Corporation, Third Party
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WIENER, Circuit Judge:
This Texas diversity case involves the interpretation of a unique indemnification provision and the application of the deemed finding and waiver provisions of Rules 49 and 51 in the context of separate trials granted under Rule 42(b).1 The district court granted summary judgment for Defendant-Appellee Force Corporation (Force), holding that, under the terms of the indemnity clause, Force could only be required to indemnify Plaintiff-Appellant Anheuser-Busch, Inc. (Anheuser) for claims and suits for death, bodily injury, or property damage caused by Force’s acts or…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Elbaor v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by128 opinions
- TIG Insurance v. Sedgwick James of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- In the Matter of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- New York Life Insurance v. DeshotelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Askanase v. FatjoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- In Re EMC CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.