Legal Opinion

Cavitt v. Amsler

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 19, 1922No. 6421. [fn*]PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Findings of Fact.

On June 16, 1915, appellant brought suit No. 22555 (district court number) against appellee Amsler, to recover the title and possession of 50 shares of stock in the McGregor Milling Company, and to recover $100 in dividends, alleged to have been paid to Amsler after the sale of said stock to Cavitt. On December 20, 1916, judgment was rendered in favor of appellant for a specific performance of the contract for the sale of such stock and for the recovery of the $100 dividend sued for. On July 6, 1917, appellant filed his petition for a mandatory injunction, in cause No. 23679…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Moore v. SnowballTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  2. James v. JamesTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Philipowski v. SpencerTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Yeaman v. Galveston City CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Gordon v. Rhodes & DanielTexas Supreme Court · 1909

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Mahaney & HigginsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Lee C. Ritchie v. Ann Caldwell Rupe, as Trustee for the Dallas Gordon Rupe, III 1995 Family TrustTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Gilbert Jackson v. Howard Johnson, Dallas Police OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Rogers v. Ricane Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1996

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API